"It's the Union, Jack!"

"It's the Union, Jack!"

The reason patents will not be affected very much by Brexit is that the European Patent Office is not an EU institution.  It refers to geographical Europe.  In contrast, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (which handles trade marks and designs) is official an agency of the European Union.  It refers to political Europe.
 
Nicolas Vigneron, EU IPO Programme Manager (Service Quality Programme) was one of our guests at the AIPEX meeting in Lyon earlier this month (AIPEX is a European Law Firm that Wynne-Jones IP part owns).  During the meeting, he gave us a presentation, and we noticed that all of his slides had the word “Union” removed from the name “European Union”.   
 
After the use of some clever persuasion techniques (we gave him dinner and wine), Nicolas explained why. 
 
The role of the EU IPO in the Brexit process is to provide the European Commission with information and options as far as intellectual property is concerned.  It is for the European Commission to decide on the EU’s policy accordingly.  It seems one option put forward by the EU IPO is that it becomes the E IPO, and handles trade marks and designs throughout geographical Europe and not only just the European Union.  To the EU IPO, this is quite a sensible suggestion.  It already recognises attorneys from the European Economic Area (EEA) and not merely the EU.  It already operates non-EU register databases (TM View and Design View).  And it already operates internationally to promote worldwide convergence in the field of intellectual property.
 
It is (just about) conceivable that the EU Trade Mark and Design Regulations could become European Trade Mark and Design Regulations instead.  The UK, along with EEA countries like Norway and Switzerland, might then continue to have access to them, in return for paying membership fees.
 
If you take the Union out of the EU IPO, maybe you get to keep the Union Jack after all…………. 
 
Wynne-Jones IP will keep on top of this story in the month’s ahead and let you know as soon as we hear anything more.

Related News

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments
news

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments

After a patent application has been filed, the inventor may be required to sign and submit various forms.  What happens if this is several years into the patent process, and the inventor can no longer be reached to sign these forms?  And what can you do now to prevent any complications from arising?

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021
news

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) temporarily reduced or removed certain official fees associated with patents, trade marks and registered designs because of the disruption caused by the Coronavirus pandemic. However, the temporary fee changes are set to end on 31 March 2021.

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs
news

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs

If you own any intellectual property (IP) rights, are you concerned about your exposure to litigation, and how you will finance any legal action?  One way to address this concern is by means of an insurance policy.

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?
news

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?

A recent study performed by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has shown that companies which own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design generate on average 20% higher revenues per employee and pay their staff on average 19% higher wages compared to companies that do not own any of these intellectual property (IP) rights.

Let it go!
news

Let it go!

Keeping an IP budget afloat despite sunk costs.

The cost of securing IP can be heavily front loaded. Examples of such costs include patent drafting, pre-filing searches, filing fees, etc. These costs become “sunk” costs in that they cannot be recovered. Because IP protection can be a relatively long process, at any time during the process there are likely to be significant “prospective” costs: future costs that may be wholly or partially avoided depending on actions taken.

Turkish Declarations of Use
news

Turkish Declarations of Use

Have you recently validated your European patent in Turkey?  Did you know that in addition to paying annual renewal fees, Turkish law also requires you to submit a public declaration stating whether you have actively worked your invention in Turkey?

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
news

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis

UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right?  Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
news

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?

The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo