News & Events about IP just for you
News Events

What should I be doing now? Part 1 – To file or not to file?

The up-turn since the Brexit vote (23.06.16) in the number of UK trade mark and design filings is continuing apace, but does it really make sense? 
 
The Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys is lobbying for EU trade mark applications and registrations to be transferred automatically into UK equivalents after Brexit.  This option (known as “the Montenegro”) has found favour with the UK IPO, who know there is a mountain of work coming their way, and so welcome any proposals that look like they will save time and effort. 
 
However, “the Montenegro” is only one of at least eight options being considered and there is ongoing uncertainty about the timings and mechanisms by which EU trade marks will be revalidated in the UK after Brexit.  Meanwhile, risk-averse businesses are continuing to refille their entire EU portfolios as UK trade marks. They do not want to leave anything to chance.
 
Amidst all of this, we realized at the recent INTA meeting in Barcelona that UK attorneys are giving widely conflicting advice to trade mark owners and their representatives. 

 
Here is what we think:
 
 We are advising clients to file both EU and UK national applications for any new mark that is intended to be used both in the EU and the UK.  This seems to us to be the pragmatic approach, taking into account the desire for certainty, versus cost and risk.  It removes any need to worry about whatever system is put in place
(….if any…..) for dividing up EU trade marks after Brexit.

 With existing EU trade marks, for those who want certainty, refilling in the UK is also a good option.  The problem with automatic revalidation of EU marks in the UK if “the Montenegro” is adopted is that it is likely to provoke a scramble between owners of conflicting rights as to who has the dominant rights in the UK.  (Rights in the UK can be based on use as well as registration, so it is not as simple as just looking at the register). 

However, the position with existing marks is less clear cut than with new ones because newly filed replacement UK applications will only have infringement rights from their (new) filing dates.  Therefore, for some trade mark owners with existing (and especially old) EU applications and registrations, refilling now in the UK will not be attractive.  To borrow a phrase popular with trade mark examiners the world over “each case has to be considered on its merits". 

We encourage all of our clients and friends around the world to contact us if they are unsure what to do.

Featured

NFTs - the new way to exploit your IP

NFTs - the new way to exploit your IP

Non-fungible tokens are the latest fashion in the cyber world. Building on blockchain technology, NFTs may be a new way to exploit intellectual property rights.

+

Related News

The scope of protection of a patent is fundamental to whether a patent is infringed.

The scope of protection of a patent is fundamental to whether a patent is infringed.

In 2017 the U.K. Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017], that fundamentally changed how U.K. patent infringement is assessed, by the (re-) introduction of a ‘doctrine of equivalents’, in which a feature that falls outside of a ‘normal’ interpretation of the claims but that nonetheless varies from the invention in a way that is ‘immaterial’,  infringes a U.K. patent. This can provide a U.K. patent with a broader scope of protection than was the case prior to the Actavis decision.

Here we look at how the Actavis decision has been applied and developed in subsequent decisions by the U.K. courts.

+
Changes to R&D Tax Credits, and introducing the Pioneer's Platform from Wynne-Jones IP

Changes to R&D Tax Credits, and introducing the Pioneer's Platform from Wynne-Jones IP

From April this year, reforms to the R&D tax-credit schemes become effective. For some, the changes will be welcomed but others will find they lose out on tax-savings in an economy with ever increasing costs. At Wynne-Jones IP, we’re delighted to offer entrepreneurs, start-ups and SME’S a bit of extra help where it’s needed most. We offer a unique service, the Pioneer’s Platform, that helps businesses secure their first patent application at an affordable cost.

+
IP Assistance for SMEs - Last Orders for the IP Access Scheme?

IP Assistance for SMEs- Last Orders for the IP Access Scheme?

Intellectual Property is a key aspect to consider for SMEs looking to develop and, if used correctly, can be a tool to grow and protect a business. However, the types and scope of protection of different forms of IP are frequently confused and misunderstood. This lack of understanding, along with the frequently prohibitive costs of certain forms of IP, is often the cause of businesses neglecting actual and potential IP rights that could be hugely beneficial. Nevertheless, there are a number of options for UK SMEs to help them develop and utilise their IP.

+
EPO Guidelines Update March 2023

EPO Guidelines Update March 2023

As of 1st March 2023, the latest version of the EPO Guidelines for Examination have entered into force. In addition to a number of minor changes, such as the provisions for drawings and debiting procedures, the Guidelines have been amended to take into account some significant changes in European patent practice over the last year.

+
Contact US
How can we help