European Commission Paper on Brexit and Intellectual Property - A good start, but the devil is in the detail

European Commission Paper on Brexit and Intellectual Property - A good start, but the devil is in the detail

The European Commission has just released a position paper on Brexit and intellectual property, which we have commented on at length for Intellectual Property Magazine (here).  In summary, the main features are these:

All registered EU trade marks, registered Community designs, unregistered Community designs, Community plant variety rights, protected geographical indications, protected designations of origin, and  other geographical indications, traditional speciality guaranteed and traditional terms for wine registered under a number of EU regulations should be automatically recognised as enforceable intellectual property rights in the UK. So too, in principle, should pending applications for registration/protection, and Supplementary Protection Certificates for patents.  Patents per se are not considered in the position paper because European patents are not under the control of the European Union.  

There should be no fees for any of this, and all renewal dates, priorities, seniorities, and claims to genuine use and reputation should be preserved. 

Database rights of UK and EU nationals and companies should be mutually recognised. 

Goods for which intellectual property rights were exhausted in the EU prior to Brexit should remain exhausted in the EU and the UK. Exhaustion means that, when a product branded with a registered trade mark is imported into a European Economic Area country with the trade mark owner's consent, the trade mark owner cannot oppose the re‐importation of this product into another European Economic Area country. 
These proposals ought to be good for rights holders.  However, as our commentary in Intellectual Property Magazine makes clear, the situation “on the ground” is a lot more complicated than the EC’s Position Paper suggests.   It also remains to be seen whether UK Government will feel able to pass the costs on to British tax payers.  There are roughly three times as many EU trade marks as there are UK ones and nineteen times as many EU designs as UK ones, so the costs of recognising all of these extra rights in the UK will be significant.  
 
So far, the only response we have heard from anyone associated with the UK IPO is that the EC’s proposals are “interesting”.  Undoubtedly, however, it would be beneficial if the UK Government could reassure businesses, especially ones that want protection in the UK, but are currently reliant on EU rights, that those rights will continue in force in the UK after Brexit.  This would be especially important for owners of registered Community designs, which cannot be validly re-filed in the UK for lack of novelty. 
 
As soon as we hear anything more definitive on the part of the UK Government or the UK IPO, we will report it in “2306”.
 
In the meantime, do please read our full commentary on the EC’s Position Paper in Intellectual Property Magazine and let us know if you have any questions.

Related News

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments
news

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments

After a patent application has been filed, the inventor may be required to sign and submit various forms.  What happens if this is several years into the patent process, and the inventor can no longer be reached to sign these forms?  And what can you do now to prevent any complications from arising?

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021
news

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) temporarily reduced or removed certain official fees associated with patents, trade marks and registered designs because of the disruption caused by the Coronavirus pandemic. However, the temporary fee changes are set to end on 31 March 2021.

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs
news

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs

If you own any intellectual property (IP) rights, are you concerned about your exposure to litigation, and how you will finance any legal action?  One way to address this concern is by means of an insurance policy.

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?
news

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?

A recent study performed by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has shown that companies which own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design generate on average 20% higher revenues per employee and pay their staff on average 19% higher wages compared to companies that do not own any of these intellectual property (IP) rights.

Let it go!
news

Let it go!

Keeping an IP budget afloat despite sunk costs.

The cost of securing IP can be heavily front loaded. Examples of such costs include patent drafting, pre-filing searches, filing fees, etc. These costs become “sunk” costs in that they cannot be recovered. Because IP protection can be a relatively long process, at any time during the process there are likely to be significant “prospective” costs: future costs that may be wholly or partially avoided depending on actions taken.

Turkish Declarations of Use
news

Turkish Declarations of Use

Have you recently validated your European patent in Turkey?  Did you know that in addition to paying annual renewal fees, Turkish law also requires you to submit a public declaration stating whether you have actively worked your invention in Turkey?

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
news

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis

UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right?  Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
news

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?

The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo