Should we try to trade mark a Twitter #hashtag?

Should we try to trade mark a Twitter #hashtag?

Social media is simply another medium through which companies can advertise their product offering, in much the same way as in the past “doing business online” was new and exciting; but this still sits alongside traditional advertising media such as radio and TV advertising, paper advertising and word of mouth.

So do businesses need a whole new strategy to protect their social media campaigns, or should this simply be treated as part and parcel of existing brand protection strategies? And do Twitter hashtags need special treatment during the trade mark registration process?
In much the same way that slogans and straplines don’t benefit from special treatment during the registration process (although some commentators will argue that they are treated more harshly), Twitter hashtags still need to be approached in the same way as other brand elements. The question is does the hashtag meet the criteria for being registered as a trade mark? So we are back to first principles:

  • Is the hashtag distinctive? Will people realise that it is supposed to be distinguishing your offering from that of someone else? This is potentially the biggest hurdle with many hashtags.
  • Is the hashtag descriptive of your product offering in some way? If the answer is yes you have another hurdle as you cannot have exclusive rights in something others will genuinely want to use to describe their offering.
  • Is the hashtag a generic term for your product offering? Again, competitors need to be able to use generic terms without fear of infringement.

Whilst there are other criteria determining the ability to register, these are likely to be the three key hurdles to address in considering possible trade mark protection for a hashtag. And if you obtain a registration, does this impact on how your hashtag is used in social media? To maintain a registration you need to control use. By the very nature of a hashtag you are encouraging third parties to make use and comment using the hashtag, which is somewhat contrary to the usual position with a trade mark. How do you control this? Will this lead to misuse of your hashtag in relation to third party goods? Will you be able to maintain the integrity of your registration and its ability to distinguish you from third parties? Is there a risk of damaging the reputation in your brand? These are going to be different challenges to the perhaps more straightforward question of whether or not you can obtain registration, and may lead to a revised approach to social media strategy, including choice of hashtag at the outset and the vision for how this will be used, monitored and controlled, so that any misuses are quickly spotted and addressed.

Related News

news

Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support

A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 16th March 2020. 

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19
news

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks
news

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.

news

UK IPO announces support for those affected by coronavirus

In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”
news

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.

news

The UPC is dead, long live the UPC!

European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?

news

EPO official fees to increase on 1 April 2020

The EPO adjusts its fees every two years. The EPO has now announced the next set of fee adjustments, which will come into effect on 1 April 2020. Full details of the fee increases are listed here and here. Overall, the EPO has implemented a general inflation-based 4% increase in official fees.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo