Webmarking of patented products

Webmarking of patented products

Current situation
If a patent holder wishes to be in with the best chance of being awarded financial remedies in the event their patent is infringed, they should mark their product with the word “patent” or “patented” together with the number of the patent. This is because damages are not payable by a patent infringer who is able to prove that they were not aware of the existence of the patent, and had no reasonable grounds for supposing that the patent existed, at the time of the infringement. The current law says the infringer cannot rely on this argument to avoid paying damages if the patented product is marked in the way described above.

What’s changing
From 1st October 2014, patent holders who have marked their patented product with a web address will be able to benefit in the same way – provided that the webpage clearly associates the patent number with that product. Removing the need to mark the patent numbers directly on the product will reduce burdens and costs for businesses and individuals who own patents, and will make it easier for the public to access up-to-date patent information in relation to a product.

Options available
Patent owners will continue to have the option of marking their product with the relevant patent numbers if they prefer. Also, they will continue to have the option of not marking their products at all, and this will
have the same consequences as now - reducing the likelihood that they will successfully claim damages from an infringer.

Detail
It is in the patent owner’s interest to ensure that clear and accessible information is provided on the webpage, making it easy for the public to ascertain which patents apply to the product. Providing clear information will ensure that the patent owner is in with the best chance of benefiting during any infringement proceedings. The web address provided on the product must direct the reader to a webpage which clearly associates the product with the relevant patent number. The product must be clearly identified, e.g. by including any relevant model numbers and variants that exist. An example is provided at www.tivo.com/patents (as US law has already changed). Providing the web address of the home page of a company website is unlikely to suffice - unless on that home page there is a clear association between the product and the relevant patent number.
It is advisable to keep the web page as up-to-date as possible, reflecting any recent changes to the patent details for each product. Otherwise an infringer may be able to claim that they weren’t aware of the patent at the time of the infringing action. Where a dispute arises, it will be for the courts to decide whether sufficient notice had been provided.

A QR code won’t in itself provide all members of the public with notice of the relevant patent rights, but patent owners may provide a QR code on their product if they wish. They could do so in addition to providing the patent number(s) or a web address.

You can view a pdf version here

Related News

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments
news

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments

After a patent application has been filed, the inventor may be required to sign and submit various forms.  What happens if this is several years into the patent process, and the inventor can no longer be reached to sign these forms?  And what can you do now to prevent any complications from arising?

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021
news

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) temporarily reduced or removed certain official fees associated with patents, trade marks and registered designs because of the disruption caused by the Coronavirus pandemic. However, the temporary fee changes are set to end on 31 March 2021.

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs
news

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs

If you own any intellectual property (IP) rights, are you concerned about your exposure to litigation, and how you will finance any legal action?  One way to address this concern is by means of an insurance policy.

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?
news

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?

A recent study performed by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has shown that companies which own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design generate on average 20% higher revenues per employee and pay their staff on average 19% higher wages compared to companies that do not own any of these intellectual property (IP) rights.

Let it go!
news

Let it go!

Keeping an IP budget afloat despite sunk costs.

The cost of securing IP can be heavily front loaded. Examples of such costs include patent drafting, pre-filing searches, filing fees, etc. These costs become “sunk” costs in that they cannot be recovered. Because IP protection can be a relatively long process, at any time during the process there are likely to be significant “prospective” costs: future costs that may be wholly or partially avoided depending on actions taken.

Turkish Declarations of Use
news

Turkish Declarations of Use

Have you recently validated your European patent in Turkey?  Did you know that in addition to paying annual renewal fees, Turkish law also requires you to submit a public declaration stating whether you have actively worked your invention in Turkey?

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
news

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis

UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right?  Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
news

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?

The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo