Patent Emergency! What to do when you’ve (accidentally) disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application

Patent Emergency! What to do when you’ve (accidentally) disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application

Importantly, you should not assume there is nothing you can do. Please talk to your patent attorney. It may still be possible to validly file. For example, what you disclosed may not be the actual invention that would be defined in the claims of your patent application. In that case, you may still be in the game. Also, if your disclosure was confidential or if a disclosure was made as the result of an abuse, such as a breach of confidence, then it may still be possible to validly file a patent application.

Grace Periods- Patents

It is also very useful to know that in some countries it is possible to make a self-disclosure and still validly file a patent application within a period of time after the self-disclosure. This period of time where you can still file for patent protection is called the grace period.

The lists below indicate some of the countries in which it is possible to file a patent application after a disclosure. The lists are not exhaustive. Some countries stipulate that an application must be filed within six months of the disclosure while others allow a more lenient 12 months grace period. You will note that the UK and the European Patent Office do not have a grace period but some countries that are economically very significant do.

Countries which allow a 6 month grace period

Albania                              Andorra                              Japan

Russian Federation         Uzbekistan                         Eurasian Patent Organisation

Countries which allow a 12 month grace period

Algeria                                Argentina                            Armenia
Australia                            Azerbaijan                           Barbados
Belarus                               Belize                                   Bolivia
Brazil                                  Canada                                Colombia
Costa Rica                          Dominican Republic          Ecuador
El Salvador                        Estonia                                Georgia
Ghana                                 Guatemala                         Honduras
Jordan                                Kenya                                 Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia                                 Malaysia                            Malta
Mauritius                           Mexico                               Morocco
Mozambique                     Oman                                  Papua New Guinea
Peru                                    Philippines                        Republic of Korea
Sri Lanka                           Thailand                            Trinidad and Tobago
Turkey                               Ukraine                             Uruguay
USA

 

 

Grace Periods- Utility Models

Another option is to look at filing a utility model. A utility model is an IP right which is generally similar to a patent. It has a similar written description to a patent and it has patent claims. Generally, the term of protection for a utility model is less than for a patent, but it will still provide protection for a number of years (commonly 10 years). Sometimes a different term is used to describe a utility model, such as a ‘utility patent’.

The lists below indicate some of the countries in which it is possible to file a utility model after a disclosure. For simplicity, we do not show countries where it is already possible to file a patent application having the same grace period.

Countries which allow a 6 month grace period

Austria                                 Bulgaria                               Czech Republic

Germany                             Hungary                               Romania

Slovak Republic

There may be other options too, which take advantage of certain ‘quirks’ in the IP laws of some countries. However, we cannot guarantee that the lists above are complete and totally correct as countries’ laws may change. Also, the exact way in which the grace period operates varies from country to country. For example, some countries place certain requirements on the patent applicant.

Conclusions

So, the main points to take away are that, even if you have publicly disclosed your invention before filing a patent application, all may not be lost. However, it is important to talk to your patent attorney as soon as possible after you realise you have made a self-disclosure. In this way, you can ensure that the correct steps are taken to maximise your position.

 

By Ian Lambert and Rebecca Quiney

Related News

news

Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support

A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 16th March 2020. 

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19
news

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks
news

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.

news

UK IPO announces support for those affected by coronavirus

In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”
news

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.

news

The UPC is dead, long live the UPC!

European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?

news

EPO official fees to increase on 1 April 2020

The EPO adjusts its fees every two years. The EPO has now announced the next set of fee adjustments, which will come into effect on 1 April 2020. Full details of the fee increases are listed here and here. Overall, the EPO has implemented a general inflation-based 4% increase in official fees.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo