Wynne-Jones IP Uniquely Positioned For Brexit

Wynne-Jones IP Uniquely Positioned For Brexit

Wynne-Jones IP is uniquely positioned among UK patent and trade mark attorneys to continue to handle EU work by virtue of our membership of the AIPEX European Alliance.  Importantly, we can still file and prosecute “Pan-European” IP applications for European Patents, European Union Trade Marks and Registered Community Designs, and subsequently enforce the resulting rights.

AIPEX, was founded in 2010, and is registered in Munich, Germany.  AIPEX has partner members in key industrial territories of Europe: Wynne-Jones IP in the UK,  AOMB in The Netherlands, Germain & Maureau  in France, Prinz & Partner  in Germany, Herrero & Asociados in Spain, SBGK in Hungary and AOMB Polska in Poland.

AIPEX attorneys work together as a team of over 200 professionals to combine national and local knowledge as well as professional capacity and experience in all the necessary technical and legal specialties.  Through AIPEX, Wynne-Jones IP is able to provide an agile and comprehensive response to any changes in the IP landscape in Europe, whether Brexit or beyond.

IP IN EUROPE AFTER BREXIT

Equally importantly, there is no reason to be concerned about the immediate impact of the Brexit decision on intellectual property rights.  This is because:

Patents
European patents are administered by the European Patent Office according to the European Patent Convention (EPC). European patents cover all member states to the EPC, which includes the UK, and not just EU states. Also, membership of the EPC is not dependent on membership of the EU - there are presently several member states of the EPC which are not members of the EU, including Norway and Switzerland.

Accordingly, the UK’s relationship with the current European patent system is unaffected by the Brexit decision.

However, it is expected that the proposed so-called “unitary patent”, which has not yet come into force, will be affected by the Brexit decision. The unitary patent will be administered by the European Patent Office as part of the European patent application process. It is intended to provide applicants with the option of designating or protecting their invention in all EU states in one hit, rather than the current process of requiring applicants to make a European patent effective in EU states, separately.

The birth of the unitary patent is dependent on the UK (in addition to other EU states) ratifying the Unitary Patent Agreement and, given that the UK is now no longer a member of the EU, it is unclear when, or indeed if, the unitary patent will come into effect.  Assuming it does, however, the unitary patent will be available to all EU states that have ratified the Unitary Patent Agreement and, while it may no longer be possible to designate or cover the UK with the proposed unitary patent, it will still be possible for applicants to select a unitary patent, and separately cover the UK as part of the current European patent system. The selection of the unitary patent option and coverage in other countries such as the UK occurs at the end of the EP patent prosecution process. Wynne-Jones IP will be able to handle all of these actions, as well as continuing to offer its high quality EP patent prosecution, opposition and appeal services.

 

Trade Marks
While we expect that registered EU trade marks will (eventually) no-longer cover the UK, we can continue to file  and prosecute EU trade mark applications, and subsequently enforce EU trade mark registrations, in view of our unique AIPEX alliance. Consequently, we will be pleased to represent our clients in all EU trade mark proceedings, including EU trade mark opposition proceedings, as we have always done.

The uncertainty concerning EU trade marks relates to those EU registered trade marks which are presently in force. Unless the UK Governments enacts suitable transitional legislation to recognize registered EU trade mark rights in the UK, then it may be the case that existing registered EU trade marks will no longer provide trade mark protection in the UK.  We think this is unlikely because it would result in a loss of rights to EU trade mark registrants, but will provide further information about this when it becomes available.

Designs
Similarly, while registered EU designs will (eventually) no-longer cover the UK, we can also continue to file and prosecute registered EU design applications, and subsequently enforce EU design registrations, in view of our unique AIPEX alliance. Consequently, we will be pleased to represent our clients in all EU design proceedings, as we have always done.

Again however, the uncertainty concerning registered EU designs relates to those EU registered designs that are presently in force. Unless the UK Government enacts suitable transitional legislation to recognize registered EU design rights in the UK, it may be the case that existing registered EU designs will no longer provide design protection in the UK.  Once again, we think this is unlikely because of the consequences of loss of rights in relation to designs, which rely on novelty, and hence cannot be re-instated by later UK design applications.

In addition, EU design law also provides for unregistered EU design rights. This unregistered right provides design protection for a period of 3 years from when the design is made publically available within the territory of the EU. The protection afforded is different from that afforded by unregistered UK design rights, both substantively and in terms of duration.  Accordingly, unless any transitional arrangements are put in place, it is likely that, for some designs, unregistered EU design protection will be lost as far as the UK is concerned.  It is also likely that design publications in the UK will no-longer trigger the existence of the right.

Conclusion
For now, nothing has changed and it is business a usual.  Inevitably, there will be changes in a few years time, but Wynne-Jones IP is committed to supporting our clients and our associates around the world with all their needs in the UK and the European Union, no matter what the changes in the European IP landscape.  Our position as a founding member of the European alliance of independent IP law firms – AIPEX – makes us uniquely placed among UK patent and trade mark attorneys to do this.

We look forward to continuing to be of service.

Daniel Butler | Victor Caddy | Gareth Jenkins | Ian Lambert | James Robertson | Vicki Strachan
LLP Partners
For and on behalf of Wynne-Jones IP

Related News

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments
news

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments

After a patent application has been filed, the inventor may be required to sign and submit various forms.  What happens if this is several years into the patent process, and the inventor can no longer be reached to sign these forms?  And what can you do now to prevent any complications from arising?

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021
news

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) temporarily reduced or removed certain official fees associated with patents, trade marks and registered designs because of the disruption caused by the Coronavirus pandemic. However, the temporary fee changes are set to end on 31 March 2021.

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs
news

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs

If you own any intellectual property (IP) rights, are you concerned about your exposure to litigation, and how you will finance any legal action?  One way to address this concern is by means of an insurance policy.

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?
news

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?

A recent study performed by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has shown that companies which own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design generate on average 20% higher revenues per employee and pay their staff on average 19% higher wages compared to companies that do not own any of these intellectual property (IP) rights.

Let it go!
news

Let it go!

Keeping an IP budget afloat despite sunk costs.

The cost of securing IP can be heavily front loaded. Examples of such costs include patent drafting, pre-filing searches, filing fees, etc. These costs become “sunk” costs in that they cannot be recovered. Because IP protection can be a relatively long process, at any time during the process there are likely to be significant “prospective” costs: future costs that may be wholly or partially avoided depending on actions taken.

Turkish Declarations of Use
news

Turkish Declarations of Use

Have you recently validated your European patent in Turkey?  Did you know that in addition to paying annual renewal fees, Turkish law also requires you to submit a public declaration stating whether you have actively worked your invention in Turkey?

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
news

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis

UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right?  Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
news

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?

The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo