Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support
A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 31st March 2020.
How big a problem is the counterfeit goods market?
Don Pennant of Wynne-Jones says it is an ever increasing problem. It is estimated over £1.3 billion is lost in profits and taxes through counterfeiting every year. However, there have been great strides to try and combat counterfeiting in UK. The Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU funded by the UK Intellectual Property Office) was established in 2013 and specialises in IP related law enforcement. NCA (National Crime Agency) has a dedicated department dealing with IP crime. CITMA and CIPA are the bodies that represent UK Trade Mark and Patent Attorneys and constantly support the efforts of the crime fighters. The UK Customs and Excise offer the opportunity of recording registered trade marks with them to help distinguish potential counterfeits. Trading Standards are also active in removing fakes from the marketplace.
To what extent do fraudsters use online marketplaces like eBay, Amazon, etc.?
Some online sites are a huge source of counterfeit goods entering the UK marketplace. Many of the counterfeits originate from China and are exported to UK where one of the easiest ways to sell is online. The ability to remain anonymous and reach a global custom base make these markets places very attractive indeed for criminals.
How do the scams work?
Sales online don’t allow the customer to actually physically touch the product. The pictures on these sites often don’t represent the product being sold. Often ‘genuine product receipts’ are provided with the product delivered but these are in themselves fake. Even a seller who has imported counterfeit goods may not be aware that they are infringing third party rights or that their activity is a criminal offence. Some online sites may sell both original products as well as counterfeits in an attempt to look more legitimate.
What is the impact on the brands involved?
Often the quality of the goods is poor. This will have a detrimental effect on the brand reputation with purchasers refraining from buying the product again. Often the purchase price is much cheaper which affects purchasers’ perception of the value of a brand.
What is the impact on the reputation of the retailer?
The sale of counterfeit goods leads to a loss of sales and damage to a business. Even if the quality is OK the counterfeits takes unfair advantage of the brand riding on the hard earnt reputation built up by the owner. The Counterfeit products dilute the owner’s goodwill in its brand. Such goods in the health and safety industries can have devastating consequences leading to an immediate reduction in reputation even if subsequently the goods are shown to be fake.
Who is accountable?
Everyone involved from the manufacturer of the counterfeit product to the importer and/or exporter, anyone storing such goods, the distributor and finally the seller. Unfortunately often the purchaser knows they are buying a fake product so finally the purchaser may be accountable as well.
What is the law covering this area and is it sufficient or employed correctly?
Trade Mark law (Trade Marks Act 1994). This allows owners to register trade marks. Such registered rights help PIPCU and the NCA, as well as the courts, to take quicker and more cost effective action against infringers. Copyright, Designs and Patents law (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988). Patent and design rights are enforced in the same way as trade marks. Copyright is an automatic right in original works and is useful in combating fake DVDs and CDs in the film and music industry and copying of computer software.
What measures are in place to combat this kind of fraud?
Owning Intellectual Property rights is essential, whether that is a patent, a trade mark or a design. Wynne-Jones has a long tradition of helping companies protect their IP rights. These rights all help the courts allow enforcement by the owners against infringers. The rights are also essential when requesting Amazon and eBay to close sites selling infringing products. Often without such registered rights Amazon and eBay will refuse to take any action. Rights are also used by Customs and Excise in controlling the boarders.
Are the sites doing enough to protect consumers and brands?
If one is able to produce documentation of registered intellectual property most online marketplaces will act to prevent infringement. Without registered rights the sites are reluctant to act and often refuse to as they claim not to have the resource to check all products being sold. It is up to the rights holder to advise of fake goods being sold.
What more, if anything, can be done?
UK authorities can continue to liaise with foreign law enforcement agencies to try and prevent fake goods being manufactured and/or exported. Wynne-Jones IP offers a registration service allowing recordal of registered IP rights with UK Customs and Excise to help them identify potential counterfeits. This service extends to EU and China Customs bodies helping prevent exports to UK Trading Standards are also active in removing fakes from the marketplace. However, they are very busy and it is often difficult to obtain their help without obvious and serious offence being established. The onus is still with rights holders to inform the relevant agencies and or website owners of details of its rights for the necessary actions to be taken.
What should consumers who want to avoid fake products look out for?
Price, packaging, quality and where the goods are on sale. Unofficial sites are always a good indication. As are online auction sites. But eBay and Amazon are still main targets for counterfeiters as if one site gets closed down another can be set up shortly after.
What should brands do if they spot fakes online?
There are a number of actions that can be taken. Apply to bring down the site. Contact CITMA or CIPA for advise on how best to proceed. Advise PIPUC or NCA who may be able to help. Contact the site owner advising them of the rights owned & the infringement and requesting goods be destroyed.
A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 31st March 2020.
The German Federal Constitutional Court has now issued its long-awaited decision (https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2020/bvg20-020.html) in case 2 BvR 739/17 which was a complaint against the German Ratification Law under which Germany was to ratify the UPC.
On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.
The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.
In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.
Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.
European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?
Due to the coronavirus outbreak and recent health advice, the WJ team are working from home. It’s business as usual however some services may be slightly slower than normal so please bear with us during this time. As our offices are currently closed we will not be able to access postal mail so please send correspondence and documents by email on email@example.com. Our telephones have been diverted so the WJ team are still contactable by phone on 01242 267 600.