WJIP asks – What does being IP inclusive mean to you?

WJIP asks – What does being IP inclusive mean to you?

There are many misconceptions that surround the intellectual property profession. Needing a first in your degree, that you must have attended an elite university, such as Cambridge, or that it is simply a boring ‘desk job’, are just some of false beliefs many hold.

 Here at Wynne Jones IP we are challenging these common misconceptions and supporting greater diversity, equality, and inclusivity across our profession. Here three of our senior trainees, Matthew Veale, Grace Mason-Jarrett, and Piotr Mach, reveal what they falsely believed before entering the profession and what IP inclusivity means to them.


What did you falsely believe before applying to a role within the IP profession?

Matthew: I believed that IP was not sustainably different around the world.

Piotr: I thought it was a boring job dealing with the papers/documents only.

Grace: I didn’t know a great deal about it so hadn’t formed any opinions.


Does the role provide you with more variety than you expected?

Matthew: Yes we cover anything and everything.

Grace: Absolutely, I think when (non-attorney) people think of patents they think of Big Pharma companies but in our practice that’s not the case at all.

Piotr: Yes, it means exposure to a variety of work across different technical fields- which is great!


What common misconceptions do people have with the IP profession?

Matthew: That you need a law degree, you cover all areas of commercial/cooperate law, and generally what IP is?  

Grace: From careers fairs it seems a lot of people worry that they have no experience of the profession or understanding of the Law prior to starting, but that’s really not required.

Piotr: People think you need to attend a top university, get a first, and that Brexit will have a big impact on the profession.



Is there a lack of understanding about the IP profession at university/college/school?

Matthew: Yes, there should be a module at least related to IP law in every degree, there should be some exposure to IP in the school curriculum

Grace: I rarely (if ever?) discussed it at university/college/school. It wasn’t something I came across, I think there is a lack of understanding in that it’s not widely known about particularly outside of the engineering degrees. At Southampton University the electrical Engineers had a talk from an Attorney about becoming a patent attorney, but us physics students didn’t get that.

Piotr: Yes – “are we lawyers?” is a question I get asked quite a lot!


And finally, what does being IP inclusive mean to you?

Matthew: For me, it’s thinking independently together

Grace: To me being IP inclusive means listening to everyone‘s perspective in order to obtain the best solution (for the client or for the firm)

Piotr: It definitely means working towards a more accessible and supportive IP profession regardless of background. In particular, knowing that this initiative exists not only helps me to be myself and feel respected, but also raises my openness to others

For more information on IP inclusive, visit http://www.ipinclusive.org.uk/

Want to be part of an inclusive team? Head over to Our Latest Positions


Related News


Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support

A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 16th March 2020. 

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.


UK IPO announces support for those affected by coronavirus

In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.


The UPC is dead, long live the UPC!

European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?


EPO official fees to increase on 1 April 2020

The EPO adjusts its fees every two years. The EPO has now announced the next set of fee adjustments, which will come into effect on 1 April 2020. Full details of the fee increases are listed here and here. Overall, the EPO has implemented a general inflation-based 4% increase in official fees.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo