Spotting fake invoices relating to IP rights

Spotting fake invoices relating to IP rights

What are the tell tale warning signs of a fake invoice relating to IP rights? What should IP owners be mindful of?

 

Warning sign 1: If you have an official and recorded representative, you should not receive any invoices other than those from that appointed party.

 

Warning sign 2: Often the fake invoices will use names, personal information, acronyms and/or logos which are very similar to the official organisations. These invoices will often request payment for a service such as:

 

-          Renewal of your IP rights

-          Publication/Registration of your IP rights

-          Expansion of your IP rights

-          Other IP related services

 

Warning sign 3: Fake invoices will often request payment for publication in an independent database or journal.  These databases have no legal effect - only the responsible Intellectual Property Offices around the world can publish and register IP rights with legal effect.  These are the UKIPO, EPO, WIPO, EUIPO. There is no separate fee for publication of an IP right, as this is an automatic process. 

 

What sorts of invoices relating to IP rights are IP owners  likely to receive directly that are legitimate?

 

If you have an official, recorded representative, you should only receive invoices directly from that party.  Please note, the UK and EP/EU Offices do not issue any invoices directly to applicants. Instead the IP Offices will send a notification which will direct the applicant to the official webpages, where a secure payment can be made. If in doubt on any invoices you receive, check with your IP professional. It’s always better to check an unsolicited or suspicious invoice, before any payment is made.

 

What should IP owners do if you receive a suspicious looking invoice?

 

If you receive an invoice which at all seems suspicious, you should immediately contact your IP professional. In the event you do not have a recorded representative, you can contact the relevant Intellectual Property Office, the Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (CITMA) or the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA). Do not use the contact details provided on the invoice.

Examples of misleading invoices and a list of sources can be found on the WIPO website  

 

Do not make payment of any suspicious invoice without first validating its authenticity. If you receive a fraudulent invoice you should report this to Action Fraud. Action Fraud is an online portal, operated by the City of London police, for reporting all types of fraud.

 

Success story

The UK IPO successfully took action against the Intellectual Property Agency (IPA) for TM infringement/passing off. Read the story here.  

If you suspect you have received a fake invoice, let us check it for you. 

Related News

news

Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support

A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 31st March 2020. 

BREAKING NEWS - German Federal Constitutional Court decides on UPC complaint
news

BREAKING NEWS - German Federal Constitutional Court decides on UPC complaint

The German Federal Constitutional Court has now issued its long-awaited decision (source) in case  2 BvR 739/17 which was a complaint against the German Ratification Law under which Germany was to ratify the UPC.

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19
news

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks
news

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.

news

UK IPO announces support for those affected by coronavirus

In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”
news

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.

news

The UPC is dead, long live the UPC!

European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?

UPDATE - UK IPO support for those affected by Coronavirus
news

UPDATE - UK IPO support for those affected by Coronavirus

The UKIPO has now certified that a ‘period of interruption’ began on Tuesday 24 March 2020.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo