ECJ ruling sees Louboutin walk all over the competition

ECJ ruling sees Louboutin walk all over the competition

The question over whether a shoe sole can be trade marked has taken a designer step forward this week.

Christian Louboutin has won the backing of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in its ongoing legal battle to protect its world-renowned red soled shoes.

The ECJ ruling is the latest chapter in the designer brand’s lengthy legal battle to protect the trade mark of its distinctive red sole.

Louboutin initially launched legal proceedings in 2012 after rival brand Van Haren began selling its own brand of red-soled shoes, which were similar in appearance to theirs.

The renowned shoe designer then sued the Dutch company which sparked a lengthy legal battle, which this week finally reached the EU’s highest court.

The case has ignited discussion throughout the intellectual property community about the protection of  shapes of products and the position of distinctive features.

In this case  the ECJ has ruled that the colour red was considered to be separate from the common shape of a shoe as well as the sole. It has therefore been awarded protection. It is now down to the Dutch Court to deliver the final ruling. 

Gareth JenkinsPartner and Trade Mark Attorney at Wynne Jones IP said the case was a potential game changer when it came to seeking additional commercial advantage through  trade marks. This landmark ruling will no doubt set a precedent for other brands within the fashion and design industries looking to secure their position through more innovative and distinct branding".

“This is a positive decision for brand owners and I’m certain that it will spark a number of cases of designers looking to protect all sorts of colours, positioned all over products.   

“Once the Dutch court delivers its final ruling it should allow Louboutin to protect its brand against potential copycats and those looking to exploit its reputation by infringing on the shoes’ distinctive feature in the future.

“What is certain is this case will undoubtedly lead to a number of interesting trade mark opportunities over the coming years.”

 

 

 

Related News

news

Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support

A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 16th March 2020. 

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19
news

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks
news

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.

news

UK IPO announces support for those affected by coronavirus

In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”
news

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.

news

The UPC is dead, long live the UPC!

European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?

news

EPO official fees to increase on 1 April 2020

The EPO adjusts its fees every two years. The EPO has now announced the next set of fee adjustments, which will come into effect on 1 April 2020. Full details of the fee increases are listed here and here. Overall, the EPO has implemented a general inflation-based 4% increase in official fees.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo