Is Kit Kat’s trade mark saga set to take a break?

Is Kit Kat’s trade mark saga set to take a break?

For over a decade Nestlé has attempted to protect Kit Kat’s three dimensional shape, with rival Mondelez fighting hard to prevent its success.

Last Wednesday marked the latest chapter in the lengthy legal battle, as the European Court of Justice dismissed the confectionary giant’s most recent appeal to safeguard the shape of its famed bar.

 

In the ruling the court said that Nestle had failed to demonstrate that the bar’s shape was of distinctive enough character in all the countries it was attempting to obtain a trademark in.

 

This latest blow comes 12 years after Nestle originally secured a trademark for its four-finger bar in 2006 from the EUIPO. This prompted Cadbury owner Mondelez, which produces the similarly shaped Leo Bar and Norwegian Kvikk Lunsj, to appeal against the decision.

 

The case returned to court in 2016 with a lower EU court annulling the original ruling, and challenging Nestle to demonstrate that Kit Kat’s shape was “distinctive enough through use” in every EU country it sought protection in.

 

In the latest ruling it was disclosed that Nestle had proved the bar’s distinctiveness in 10 nations, but failed in Belgium, Ireland, Greece, and Portugal. As a result, Nestle’s trademark protecting the shape of its Kit Kat could now be in jeopardy.

 

The ruling could be significantly detrimental to the confectionary company, as own-brand imitations could soon start appearing on supermarket shelves, looking to capitalize on Kit Kat’s success.

 

Nestle’s latest legal battle has once again ignited discussion throughout the intellectual property community about what criteria is required to gain EU-wide protection for shapes.

 

Rosie Le Breton, trainee trademark attorney at Wynne Jones IP, said the case highlights “challenges faced by companies whose product success is intrinsically tied into their ability to be distinctive”.

 

She said: “This is the latest ruling in what has been an increasingly complex and legally significant case for both Nestle and Mondelez.

 

“Patent attorneys and those across the IP industry have been watching the unfolding drama keenly for the past 12 years, as the result could set a vital legal precedent for how registered shape marks are considered in future cases.

 

“Alongside the IP industry, the dismissal will also no doubt have a ripple effect across the business world, from retail to fashion and beyond. Companies could now be set to reassess realistically just how distinctive their own brand shapes are and if they could withstand a legal challenge.

 

“Furthermore, the ruling could have an even wider impact on the design of new products, with brands intentionally creating uniquely distinctive shapes in a bid to avoid a Nestle vs Mondelez style battle.”

Related News

news

Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support

A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 31st March 2020. 

BREAKING NEWS - German Federal Constitutional Court decides on UPC complaint
news

BREAKING NEWS - German Federal Constitutional Court decides on UPC complaint

The German Federal Constitutional Court has now issued its long-awaited decision (source) in case  2 BvR 739/17 which was a complaint against the German Ratification Law under which Germany was to ratify the UPC.

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19
news

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks
news

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.

news

UK IPO announces support for those affected by coronavirus

In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”
news

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.

news

The UPC is dead, long live the UPC!

European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?

UPDATE - UK IPO support for those affected by Coronavirus
news

UPDATE - UK IPO support for those affected by Coronavirus

The UKIPO has now certified that a ‘period of interruption’ began on Tuesday 24 March 2020.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo