IP expert claims Aldi “copycat” make up could be damaging to bigger brands

IP expert claims Aldi “copycat” make up could be damaging to bigger brands

Aldi’s newly released, discounted beauty products have been accused of “potentially infringing” major labels including Benefit, Nars, and Charlotte Tilbury.

The supermarket chain has recently unveiled its latest low-price Lacura cosmetics line, leading many observers, beauty shoppers and intellectual property experts to suggest they could be copycats of more established brands.

Aldi’s new, own-branded products, which include blush, bronzer, mascara and primer, have sparked controversy due to the similarities their distinctive design and packaging share with several well-known cosmetic labels, including Smashbox, Nars, and Benefit.

The difference in price between Aldi’s discounted cosmetic products and the major brand versions is significant, in one instance it is as much as £42. Aldi’s Broadway Shape and Glow bronzer, which has been likened to Charlotte Tilbury’s Filmstar Bronze and Glow, is selling for just £6.99 while the established brand is priced at £49. This has led many experts to speculate about the damaging effect of alleged copycat products on branded goods.

This isn’t the first time the German retailer has been accused of potentially infringing the intellectual property rights of established brands. Earlier this year sausage brand Heck and yoghurt maker The Collective also accused Aldi of copying their brands, a claim which the supermarket chain has denied.

But when it comes to own-brand “copycat” products, Jason Aghatise, our Chartered Trade Mark Attorney, said they could be extremely damaging to brands and their reputations.

Mr Aghatise said: “Consumers and industry experts alike have long speculated that big brands, such as Aldi, may have infringed their intellectual property rights by creating own-brand versions, which bear a striking resemblance to well-known products on the market.

“Put simply, an own-brand copycat product imitates the design of a leading brand to free ride on the latter's reputation. The issue of own-brand copycats allegedly infringing larger brand’s rights isn’t new. We see accusations of own-brand infringement frequently, which is why the industry will be keenly observing the unfolding legal action threatened by Heck as it could set a precedent for future cases.

“While many shoppers and bargain hunters may believe purchasing discounted brands to be harmless, and may even take advantage of the lower pricing, we believe that this could be extremely damaging to cosmetic companies which have invested significant funds, time and effort into creating, marketing, and launching successful products.

“A cheaper and potentially inferior version could not only damage the brand’s reputation, if it is poorly made, it could also drive sales away from established labels and place their longevity in jeopardy.”

Aldi has refuted claims that its own-brand products are copycats and has denied accusations of infringement.

Image source: www.shevolutionuk.com

Related News

news

Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support

A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 31st March 2020. 

BREAKING NEWS - German Federal Constitutional Court decides on UPC complaint
news

BREAKING NEWS - German Federal Constitutional Court decides on UPC complaint

The German Federal Constitutional Court has now issued its long-awaited decision (source) in case  2 BvR 739/17 which was a complaint against the German Ratification Law under which Germany was to ratify the UPC.

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19
news

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks
news

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.

news

UK IPO announces support for those affected by coronavirus

In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”
news

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.

news

The UPC is dead, long live the UPC!

European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?

UPDATE - UK IPO support for those affected by Coronavirus
news

UPDATE - UK IPO support for those affected by Coronavirus

The UKIPO has now certified that a ‘period of interruption’ began on Tuesday 24 March 2020.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo