Small Irish business wins ’David and Goliath’ trade mark case against McDonalds

Small Irish business wins ’David and Goliath’ trade mark case against McDonalds

An Irish fast-food company has claimed a famous victory over one of the biggest brands in the world. Supermac, a beloved restaurant chain throughout Ireland and Northern Ireland, has successfully challenged McDonalds over its trade mark for ‘Big Mac’ in the European Union.

The case arose after Supermac attempted to expand into the EU, but was prevented by McDonalds owing to the alleged similarities between the terms ‘Supermac’ and ‘Big Mac’.  Supermac responded by applying to have McDonald’s ‘Big Mac’ EU trade mark registration revoked on the grounds of non-use.  Although McDonald’s filed evidence of use, the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) ruled that the evidence was insufficient.

McDonald’s has a reputation for vigorously enforcing its trade marks around the world.  In fact, in 2016, a European court ruled against a Singaporean company launching ‘MacCoffee’ in the EU, agreeing that the brand would unfairly benefit from the burger giant’s reputation.

Now the tables are turned. 

Supermac’s managing director, Pat McDonagh, described the case as a “David versus Goliath scenario”, referring to the huge disparity in the size of the companies. The Irish chain accused McDonalds of using “trademark bullying” to inhibit the growth of smaller brands, hailing the ruling as “the end of the McBully”.

While we are almost certain McDonald’s will appeal (because they have lost on a technicality), it is an interesting case which will undoubtedly encourage other Davids to follow suit. 

Victor Caddy at Wynne Jones IP says “It goes to show that it is always worth challenging a registered trade mark that is old enough to be vulnerable to cancellation on the grounds of non-use because you never know if the trade mark owner has access to, or the inclination to find, the evidence it needs to prove genuine use”. 

“In 2016, the UKIPO revoked the UK registration of Gucci’s famous interlocking G’s logo, again on the grounds of non-use, and the inadequacy of the evidence Gucci filed in defense of its registration”.  

“For trade mark owners (Davids as well as Goliaths), these decisions highlight the importance of archiving evidence to demonstrate genuine use of a trade mark, and, what-is-more, archiving evidence that is as specific and detailed as possible.  You never know when you may need it.  And the consequences of not being able to prove genuine use can be catastrophic.

At Wynne Jones IP we are experts in trademark law, supporting our clients in creating enforceable trade mark registrations and valuable business assets, which lead to commercial prosperity and maximum IP protection within your specialist field.

For more information on our trade mark services please visit https://www.wynne-jones.com/our-ip-services/trade-marks/

Related News

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments
news

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments

After a patent application has been filed, the inventor may be required to sign and submit various forms.  What happens if this is several years into the patent process, and the inventor can no longer be reached to sign these forms?  And what can you do now to prevent any complications from arising?

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021
news

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) temporarily reduced or removed certain official fees associated with patents, trade marks and registered designs because of the disruption caused by the Coronavirus pandemic. However, the temporary fee changes are set to end on 31 March 2021.

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs
news

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs

If you own any intellectual property (IP) rights, are you concerned about your exposure to litigation, and how you will finance any legal action?  One way to address this concern is by means of an insurance policy.

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?
news

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?

A recent study performed by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has shown that companies which own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design generate on average 20% higher revenues per employee and pay their staff on average 19% higher wages compared to companies that do not own any of these intellectual property (IP) rights.

Let it go!
news

Let it go!

Keeping an IP budget afloat despite sunk costs.

The cost of securing IP can be heavily front loaded. Examples of such costs include patent drafting, pre-filing searches, filing fees, etc. These costs become “sunk” costs in that they cannot be recovered. Because IP protection can be a relatively long process, at any time during the process there are likely to be significant “prospective” costs: future costs that may be wholly or partially avoided depending on actions taken.

Turkish Declarations of Use
news

Turkish Declarations of Use

Have you recently validated your European patent in Turkey?  Did you know that in addition to paying annual renewal fees, Turkish law also requires you to submit a public declaration stating whether you have actively worked your invention in Turkey?

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
news

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis

UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right?  Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
news

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?

The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo