Patent Emergency! What to do when you’ve (accidentally) disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application

Patent Emergency! What to do when you’ve (accidentally) disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application

One of the cornerstones of the patent system in many countries, including the UK, is the need to apply for a patent before disclosing your invention publicly. This is because such ‘self-disclosure’ can be used to invalidate a subsequently filed patent application. That’s a horrible situation, because you may have really shot yourself in the foot in terms of getting patent protection in the UK and in many other countries. Therefore, we firmly advise that you keep the invention secret before filing a patent application on the invention.

But, in the real world these things can happen. So what can you do if you’ve accidentally disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application?

Importantly, you should not assume there is nothing you can do. Please talk to your patent attorney. It may still be possible to validly file an application. For example, what was disclosed may not be the actual invention as later defined in the claims of your patent application. In that case, you may still be in the game. Also, if your disclosure was confidential or if a disclosure was made as the result of an abuse, such as a breach of confidence, it may still be possible to validly file a patent application.

Grace Periods - Patents

It is also useful to know that in some countries it is possible to make a self-disclosure and still validly file a patent application within a period of time after the self-disclosure – namely within the grace period.

The lists below indicate some of the countries in which it is possible to file a patent application after a disclosure.  The lists are not exhaustive. Some countries stipulate that an application must be filed within six months of the disclosure while others allow a more lenient 12 months grace period. Disclosures within the grace period are not taken into account as prior art in determining novelty or inventive step of the invention in the patent application (in some countries this applies in determining only novelty). You will note that the UK and the European Patent Office do not have a grace period, but some economically very significant countries do.

 

Countries which allow a 6 month grace period:

Albania 

Andorra

Japan*

Russian Federation

Uzbekistan

Eurasian Patent Organisation

 * for disclosures made before 9 December 2017

 

Countries which allow a 12 month grace period:

Algeria

Argentina^

Armenia

Australia

Azerbaijan^

Barbados

Belarus

Belize

Bolivia

Brazil    

Canada

Colombia

Costa Rica

Dominican Republic

Ecuador

El Salvador^

Estonia

Georgia

Ghana^

Guatemala

Honduras

Japan **

Jordan^

Kenya

Kyrgyz Republic

Latvia

Malaysia

Malta

Mauritius^

Mexico^

Morocco

Mozambique^ 

Oman   

Papua New Guinea

Peru

Philippines^

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka^

Thailand^

Trinidad and Tobago^

Turkey

Ukraine               

Uruguay^

USA

 

^ disclosure not to be taken into account in determining novelty

** for disclosures made on or after 9 December 2017

 

Grace Periods - Utility Models

Another option is to look at filing a utility model (also known as a utility patent). A utility model is an IP right which is generally similar to a patent. It has a similar written description to a patent and it has patent claims. Generally, the term of protection for a utility model is less than for a patent, but it will still provide protection for a number of years (commonly 10 years).

The list below indicates some of the countries where it is possible to file a utility model after a disclosure. For simplicity, we do not show countries where it is already possible to file a patent application having the same grace period.

 

Countries which allow a 6 month grace period:

Austria

Bulgaria

Czech Republic

Germany

Hungary

Romania

Slovak Republic

   

             

There may be other options too, which take advantage of certain ‘quirks’ in the IP laws of some countries. We cannot guarantee that the lists above are complete and totally correct as countries’ laws may change. Also, the exact way in which the grace period operates varies from country to country. For example, some countries place certain requirements on the patent applicant.

Conclusions

So, the main point to take away is that, even if you have publicly disclosed your invention before filing a patent application, all may not be lost. However, it is important to talk to your patent attorney as soon as possible after you realise you have made a self-disclosure. In this way, you can ensure that the correct steps are taken to maximise your position.

Dr Ian Lambert, Rebecca Quiney, and Dr Susanna Stephen, Wynne-Jones IP Limited

© Wynne-Jones IP Limited 2019

Related News

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
news

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis

UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right?  Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
news

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?

The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?

EPO-CNIPA pilot for International Search
news

EPO-CNIPA pilot for International Search

On 12 November 2019, the EPO and CNIPA agreed to enhance their bilateral co-operation to give patent applicants filing an international patent application in English at the CNIPA, the choice to opt for the EPO as their ISA. A two year pilot programme launched on 1 December 2020, offers applicants filing international applications with the CNIPA or the International Bureau (IB) of the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) the opportunity to select the EPO as their ISA and as their International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA), rather than CNIPA.

Changes to trade mark and patent law in Gibraltar
news

Changes to trade mark and patent law in Gibraltar

In October 2020, the UK Government declared that the territorial effect of five important IP treaties would be extended to cover Gibraltar from 1 January 2021.  These treaties are the Paris Convention, the Patent Cooperation Treaty, the Madrid Protocol (on International trade marks), the Nice Agreement (on trade mark classification), and the Berne Convention (on copyright). Following on from this, a bill was passed in on 11 December 2020, making some amendments to trade mark and patent law in Gibraltar.

Much Ado About Nothing
news

Much Ado About Nothing

For a long time, a source of tension among UK trade mark and design attorneys was the fact that the UK was one of the few EU member states to abide by a decision to allow attorneys from any European Economic Area country to represent clients in proceedings before any national office of an EU member state.  With this in mind, one of the ironies of Brexit is that, from 1st January 2021, UK trade mark and design attorneys will (in general – please see below for a super-important exception!) lose the right to represent clients before the EU IPO

Messi scores in injury time…..
news

Messi scores in injury time…..

After nine-years (even Sir Alex Ferguson would have struggled to justify that), six time Ballon d’Or winner, Lionel Messi, has won a legal battle to register his name as a trade mark.

The impact of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning on the Patent Profession
news

The impact of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning on the Patent Profession

Matthew Veale discusses the impact of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning on the patent profession.

UK IPO announces temporary fee changes
news

UK IPO announces temporary fee changes

The UKIPO has temporarily reduced or removed certain fees associated with patents, trade marks and registered designs until 31 March 2021.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo