Patent Emergency! What to do when you’ve (accidentally) disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application

Patent Emergency! What to do when you’ve (accidentally) disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application

One of the cornerstones of the patent system in many countries, including the UK, is the need to apply for a patent before disclosing your invention publicly. This is because such ‘self-disclosure’ can be used to invalidate a subsequently filed patent application. That’s a horrible situation, because you may have really shot yourself in the foot in terms of getting patent protection in the UK and in many other countries. Therefore, we firmly advise that you keep the invention secret before filing a patent application on the invention.

But, in the real world these things can happen. So what can you do if you’ve accidentally disclosed your invention before you’ve filed a patent application?

Importantly, you should not assume there is nothing you can do. Please talk to your patent attorney. It may still be possible to validly file an application. For example, what was disclosed may not be the actual invention as later defined in the claims of your patent application. In that case, you may still be in the game. Also, if your disclosure was confidential or if a disclosure was made as the result of an abuse, such as a breach of confidence, it may still be possible to validly file a patent application.

Grace Periods - Patents

It is also useful to know that in some countries it is possible to make a self-disclosure and still validly file a patent application within a period of time after the self-disclosure – namely within the grace period.

The lists below indicate some of the countries in which it is possible to file a patent application after a disclosure.  The lists are not exhaustive. Some countries stipulate that an application must be filed within six months of the disclosure while others allow a more lenient 12 months grace period. Disclosures within the grace period are not taken into account as prior art in determining novelty or inventive step of the invention in the patent application (in some countries this applies in determining only novelty). You will note that the UK and the European Patent Office do not have a grace period, but some economically very significant countries do.

 

Countries which allow a 6 month grace period:

Albania 

Andorra

Japan*

Russian Federation

Uzbekistan

Eurasian Patent Organisation

 * for disclosures made before 9 December 2017

 

Countries which allow a 12 month grace period:

Algeria

Argentina^

Armenia

Australia

Azerbaijan^

Barbados

Belarus

Belize

Bolivia

Brazil    

Canada

Colombia

Costa Rica

Dominican Republic

Ecuador

El Salvador^

Estonia

Georgia

Ghana^

Guatemala

Honduras

Japan **

Jordan^

Kenya

Kyrgyz Republic

Latvia

Malaysia

Malta

Mauritius^

Mexico^

Morocco

Mozambique^ 

Oman   

Papua New Guinea

Peru

Philippines^

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka^

Thailand^

Trinidad and Tobago^

Turkey

Ukraine               

Uruguay^

USA

 

^ disclosure not to be taken into account in determining novelty

** for disclosures made on or after 9 December 2017

 

Grace Periods - Utility Models

Another option is to look at filing a utility model (also known as a utility patent). A utility model is an IP right which is generally similar to a patent. It has a similar written description to a patent and it has patent claims. Generally, the term of protection for a utility model is less than for a patent, but it will still provide protection for a number of years (commonly 10 years).

The list below indicates some of the countries where it is possible to file a utility model after a disclosure. For simplicity, we do not show countries where it is already possible to file a patent application having the same grace period.

 

Countries which allow a 6 month grace period:

Austria

Bulgaria

Czech Republic

Germany

Hungary

Romania

Slovak Republic

   

             

There may be other options too, which take advantage of certain ‘quirks’ in the IP laws of some countries. We cannot guarantee that the lists above are complete and totally correct as countries’ laws may change. Also, the exact way in which the grace period operates varies from country to country. For example, some countries place certain requirements on the patent applicant.

Conclusions

So, the main point to take away is that, even if you have publicly disclosed your invention before filing a patent application, all may not be lost. However, it is important to talk to your patent attorney as soon as possible after you realise you have made a self-disclosure. In this way, you can ensure that the correct steps are taken to maximise your position.

Dr Ian Lambert, Rebecca Quiney, and Dr Susanna Stephen, Wynne-Jones IP Limited

© Wynne-Jones IP Limited 2019

Related News

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments
news

US Inventor Declarations and Assignments

After a patent application has been filed, the inventor may be required to sign and submit various forms.  What happens if this is several years into the patent process, and the inventor can no longer be reached to sign these forms?  And what can you do now to prevent any complications from arising?

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021
news

UKIPO ending temporary fee changes on 31 March 2021

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) temporarily reduced or removed certain official fees associated with patents, trade marks and registered designs because of the disruption caused by the Coronavirus pandemic. However, the temporary fee changes are set to end on 31 March 2021.

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs
news

Insurance for IP Litigation Costs

If you own any intellectual property (IP) rights, are you concerned about your exposure to litigation, and how you will finance any legal action?  One way to address this concern is by means of an insurance policy.

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?
news

Does owning IP rights improve economic performance?

A recent study performed by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has shown that companies which own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design generate on average 20% higher revenues per employee and pay their staff on average 19% higher wages compared to companies that do not own any of these intellectual property (IP) rights.

Let it go!
news

Let it go!

Keeping an IP budget afloat despite sunk costs.

The cost of securing IP can be heavily front loaded. Examples of such costs include patent drafting, pre-filing searches, filing fees, etc. These costs become “sunk” costs in that they cannot be recovered. Because IP protection can be a relatively long process, at any time during the process there are likely to be significant “prospective” costs: future costs that may be wholly or partially avoided depending on actions taken.

Turkish Declarations of Use
news

Turkish Declarations of Use

Have you recently validated your European patent in Turkey?  Did you know that in addition to paying annual renewal fees, Turkish law also requires you to submit a public declaration stating whether you have actively worked your invention in Turkey?

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
news

Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis

UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right?  Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
news

Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?

The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo