Warning Notice of a New Type of Fake Trade Mark Payment Letter

Warning Notice of a New Type of Fake Trade Mark Payment Letter

Have you recently received a letter from the "Patent and Trademark Office" in Washington, DC? An official looking letter that demands payment and warns that your trade mark will be cancelled if you don’t pay? Here is one received by one of our clients recently. The letter gives the impression it’s a genuine communication from the USPTO with a US address, and asks for $925 to renew a trade mark. The letter has a graphic representation of the trade mark and the serial number of the mark, and an official-looking barcode on the letter. But this is not an official letter - it is sent from a private company and is a scam.

These private companies often use information freely available from the USPTO’s databases to send solicitations for, among other things, legal services, trade mark monitoring and renewal services, or registration of trade marks in unofficial publications or ‘registers’.

How can you tell it is a scam?

  • Read the fine print – in the letter the company admits that it is a ‘non-governmental company and is not connected to any of the governmental organizations’. Also, typos, poor grammar and spelling errors are common in this type of scam.
  • The USPTO will direct all official communications to your attorney or contact person of record, but this letter was sent direct to the company address. Also, all official correspondence will come from the ‘United States Patent and Trademark Office’ in Alexandria, VA, and if by e-mail, specifically from the domain ‘@uspto.gov.’
  • These letters often include a pre-paid reply envelope, as in this case, to encourage you to pay the ‘fee’ as quickly as possible.

 

 

 

 

What to do?

If you receive an unsolicited invitation, do not pay it until you have checked what services are being offered and if it is from an official source. We would always recommend that you check with your intellectual property attorney.

Many thanks to our client, SPTS Technologies Limited, for agreeing to allow us to reproduce the fake letter in its entirety. SPTS followed the best practice on dealing with these scam letters, and immediately brought it to our attention.

Ian Lambert and Susanna Stephen

 

Related News

news

Coronavirus - UK IPO, EPO and EU IPO extensions and support

A simple overview of the current status from IPOs. Last updated 31st March 2020. 

BREAKING NEWS - German Federal Constitutional Court decides on UPC complaint
news

BREAKING NEWS - German Federal Constitutional Court decides on UPC complaint

The German Federal Constitutional Court has now issued its long-awaited decision (source) in case  2 BvR 739/17 which was a complaint against the German Ratification Law under which Germany was to ratify the UPC.

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19
news

EPO announces extensions to deadlines due to COVID-19

On Sunday 15 March 2020 the EPO published a notice advising it is invoking the provisions of Rule 134(2) EPC, and has extended all periods expiring on or after publication of the notice to 17 April 2020. This may be extended by the EPO upon publication of a further notice.

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks
news

EUIPO extends all deadlines for Community Design and European Union Trade Marks

The Executive Director of the EUIPO has today (16 March 2020) issued a decision regarding extensions for all time limits on trade mark and design matters at the EUIPO. In accordance with the decision, all time limits expiring between 9 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 inclusive are extended until 1 May 2020.

news

UK IPO announces support for those affected by coronavirus

In brief, the UK IPO has indicated that it will use its discretionary powers (on a case-by-case basis) to extend time limits where possible under national and international law.

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”
news

*Update* “EPO Board of Appeal finds Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent to lack valid priority claim and upholds revocation of patent (T 0844/18)”

Earlier this year, we reported on the EPO Board of Appeal’s decision to uphold the revocation of the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent (here). Now it appears that the Broad Institute is gearing up to put forward a petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal as a last resort to save their patent.

news

The UPC is dead, long live the UPC!

European patent attorneys have been getting excited about the Unitary Patent (UP) and Unified Patent Court (UPC) for years, writing articles, and giving talks and presentations about the ins-and-outs and twists-and-turns of the whole thing. So what is the current situation? What has happened now?

UPDATE - UK IPO support for those affected by Coronavirus
news

UPDATE - UK IPO support for those affected by Coronavirus

The UKIPO has now certified that a ‘period of interruption’ began on Tuesday 24 March 2020.

aipex logo aipex logo aipex logo