A recent study performed by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has shown that companies which own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design generate on average 20% higher revenues per employee and pay their staff on average 19% higher wages compared to companies that do not own any of these intellectual property (IP) rights.
Previous studies have investigated the relationship between owning IP rights and economic performance. However, this is the largest study of this kind to date. The study analyses the economic performance of over 127,000 companies across all 27 EU member states and the UK between 2007 and 2019. A comparison was made between the economic performance of companies that own at least one patent, trade mark or registered design with companies that do not. The main indicator of economic performance was based on “revenue per employee”, which removed effects due to firm size. The large representative sample size allowed robust and representative conclusions to be drawn.
Some of the key findings of the study are listed below.
- Firms that own IP rights have, on average, 20% higher revenue per employee than firms that do not.
- The correlation of strong economic performance is most pronounced for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). SMEs that own IP rights have, on average, 68% higher revenue per employee than SMEs that do not own any IP rights. However, less than 9% of SMEs in the study owned any patents, trade marks or registered designs at all.
- Firms that own IP rights pay, on average, 19% higher wages than firms that do not. Most strikingly, firms owning patents pay, on average, 53% higher wages than firms that do not own any IP rights.
- The highest revenue per employee was associated with firms that own a combination of different IP rights. Firms owning a combination of trade mark and designs showed, on average, a 63% increase in revenue per employee compared to firms not owning any IP at all.
- Firms that own IP rights tend to have more employees than firms that do not (13.5 vs. 5.1 employees on average).
- The most IP-intensive sector is manufacturing, with 69% of large companies owning at least one patent, trade mark of registered design. This was closely followed by the information and communication sector, in which 63% of large companies being IP rights owners.
This study shows a strong relationship between owning IP rights and strong economic performance. However, there are many factors and variables that could influence the economic success of a business, so caution is needed when drawing direct conclusions.
Nevertheless, it is expected that the positive relationship between owning IP rights and economic performance could partially be due to creating incentives to engage in innovative activity. The exclusive (monopoly) rights conferred by patents, trade marks and registered designs can also lead to reduced competitive pressure, which is expected to lead to increased profitability and sales. Furthermore, licensing can create an additional income stream without having to engage in direct manufacturing activity, and so can provide a further boost to a company’s revenue.
If you would like to find out more about whether your company has any IP that could be protected, please get in touch.
- The full report published jointly by the EPO and EUIPO can be found here.
The executive summary of the report published jointly by the EPO and EUIPO can be found here
Let it go!
Keeping an IP budget afloat despite sunk costs.
The cost of securing IP can be heavily front loaded. Examples of such costs include patent drafting, pre-filing searches, filing fees, etc. These costs become “sunk” costs in that they cannot be recovered. Because IP protection can be a relatively long process, at any time during the process there are likely to be significant “prospective” costs: future costs that may be wholly or partially avoided depending on actions taken.
Managing your business-critical IP during the COVID-19 crisis
UK businesses are fighting for survival during the continuing COVID-19 outbreak and trying to trade under difficult conditions, the likes of which haven’t been seen in the living memory of most business people. If you’re afraid that your business is going to the wall, it probably isn’t the top of your mind to pay for a patent application for your new technology or a registration of the trade mark for your brand new clothing range, right? Where is the money coming from to invest in such luxuries as IP, we hear you say, when staff are being furloughed and orders have been postponed?
Videoconferencing: the future of oral proceedings at the EPO?
The European Patent Office has announced that videoconferencing will become the norm for oral proceedings before examination and opposition divisions until at least 15 September 2021. But is this a taste of what the future holds for oral proceedings at the EPO?
EPO-CNIPA pilot for International Search
On 12 November 2019, the EPO and CNIPA agreed to enhance their bilateral co-operation to give patent applicants filing an international patent application in English at the CNIPA, the choice to opt for the EPO as their ISA. A two year pilot programme launched on 1 December 2020, offers applicants filing international applications with the CNIPA or the International Bureau (IB) of the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) the opportunity to select the EPO as their ISA and as their International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA), rather than CNIPA.
Changes to trade mark and patent law in Gibraltar
In October 2020, the UK Government declared that the territorial effect of five important IP treaties would be extended to cover Gibraltar from 1 January 2021. These treaties are the Paris Convention, the Patent Cooperation Treaty, the Madrid Protocol (on International trade marks), the Nice Agreement (on trade mark classification), and the Berne Convention (on copyright). Following on from this, a bill was passed in on 11 December 2020, making some amendments to trade mark and patent law in Gibraltar.
Much Ado About Nothing
For a long time, a source of tension among UK trade mark and design attorneys was the fact that the UK was one of the few EU member states to abide by a decision to allow attorneys from any European Economic Area country to represent clients in proceedings before any national office of an EU member state. With this in mind, one of the ironies of Brexit is that, from 1st January 2021, UK trade mark and design attorneys will (in general – please see below for a super-important exception!) lose the right to represent clients before the EU IPO